What is the difference in the standard of proof required for conviction in a criminal trial and that required to find for the plaintiff in a civil trial?
The standard of proof in a civil trial is lower than the standard of proof in a criminal prosecution that
requires the prosecutor to establish the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
In a civil trial, the standard of proof requires the plaintiff to introduce at least three eye witnesses
O There is no difference in the standard of proof between a civil trial and a criminal prosecution
The standard of proof in a civil trial is higher than the standard of proof in a criminal prosecution that
requires the prosecutor to establish the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.

Norman jones, an economic historian at the university of utah, has described the views of the ancient greek philosopher aristotle on interest: aristotle defined money as a good that was consumed by use. unlike houses and fields, which are not destroyed by use, money must be spent to be used. there- fore, as we cannot rent food, so we cannot rent money. moreover, money does not reproduce. a house or a flock can produce new value by use, so it is not unreasonable to ask for a return on their use. money, being barren, should not, therefore, be expected to produce excess value. thus, interest is unnatural. what did aristotle mean in arguing that money is “barren”? why would money being barren mean that lenders should not charge interest on loans? do you agree with aristotle’s reasoning? briefly explain.