For your assignment, this week, reflect upon your personal life, including time spent at work, home, school or engaged in recreation. Discuss a Constitutional right that you see, experience, or are aware of through the media that is currently being abused. Discuss how or why this right is being abused and what, if anything, can be done to rectify the situation. Avoid hyperbolic examples by being specific.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Reflecting upon my personal life, including time spent at work, home, school, or engaged in recreation, I consider that freedom of speech -a a Constitutional right- is somewhat being limited or questioned in different media slots, social sites, or mass media.

There is no question that freedom of speech is being abused by uneducated, irresponsible, and ignorant people that use the news, or the lack of them, to criticize without arguments. The best example, social media.

Using social media has become no man's land. You can find some serious and interesting comments, but there is a plethora of misinformation, scathing critics, and "bad blood" comments that are only aimed to hurt people.

That is why sometimes, these social media sites had blocked the accounts of people, politicians, artists, of common people, that use social media to damage the reputation of someone or incite violent attacks.

On the other hand, a debate has been created questioning the right these social media sites have to block or census people's voices.

My personal invitación is that people could be more conscious and respectful because attacks and verbal aggressions just create more violence and tense moments in society.

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals

answer; george herbert mead;