1. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson are two very disputed figures I’m history. Supporters of Hamilton see him as a foward-looking visionary who opened the way for American capitalism; opponents see him as supporting an all-powerful national government that unfairly of individual liberty and Libertarian ideas; opponents see him as impractical utopian dreamer who stubbornly cling to an agricultural future which of these view do you find most convincing? Were Hamilton and Jefferson completely incompatible or is it possible to see both men as equally integral to the young republic?

It was very possible that both men were needed for our government and our country to be this way today. Both Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton had opposing views on how this nation should be run. They never agreed on anything, but their different views helped shape the nation. So, yes. I still find Hamilton's view on the matter about how things should be run better and i agree with him more than Jefferson. And they were both essential for the republic.

Explanation:

hi there!

moors is essentially another word for muslims.

the moors invaded spain around year 700, during their time ruling spain the muslims promoted religious tolerance (moors tolerated jews who were viewed as outcasts by northerners), the moors as well had a great impact on their language, and architecture (palaces were created).

i hope this !