What was the immediate cause of WW1? 1.
a. Alliances
b. Assassination of Archduke Ferdinand
c. Nationalism
d. Imperialism

2.
At first, America adopted a neutrality policy. What does this mean?

a. America was looking for ways to become involved in the war.
b. America wanted to stay out of the war.
c. America wanted to broker a treaty between the warring countries.
d. America sympathized with the Allied Powers.

3.
A German submarine sank what British ship which helped bring the U. S. into WW1?
3.
a. USS Maine
b. Ironside
c. Lusitania
d. Titantic

4.
What was the result of all the new technologies introduced during WW1?

a. They made the war much shorter than earlier wars
b. They made it easier for the Allies to advance through “No Man’s Land”.
c. They made it easier to kill and wound more soldiers than ever before in war
d. They allowed Germany to defeat the United States easily.

5.
Which of the following countries was not part of the Allied Powers?

a. United States
b. Britain
c. France
d. Germany

Five students—jalen, chris, juwan, jimmy, and ray—move into a house together and discover they share the odd habit of drinking milk with ice in it every night before bed. they own several ice trays and make a pact to always refill the trays when they are emptied so that the supply of ice will never run out. but the five often do not have the time or energy to refill the trays, and after a few weeks, it becomes quite common for them to meet in the kitchen and discover that they have no ice. this would best be characterized as what type of dilemma

Correct the sentence alice who lived next door goed to a different school

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?