A group of rebels from one country crosses a border and stages an attack on a wealthier nation’s capital. Under trade-off analysis theory, is the wealthier nation likely to attack the country where the rebels came from? No, analysis demands that war be avoided at all costs.

Yes, if the wealthier country believes the war is worth it.

Yes, a long-term war against any nation that hosts the rebel group will occur.

No, the rebel group was responsible, not the neighboring country.

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Which is one important element of romantic literature

Which of these is a constitutional duty of the lieutenant governor of the state of georgia