HEL I BEGGING YOU THIS MY LAST QUESTION OF DAY AND I NEED HELP own WORD

ALSO SMART PEOPLE ANSWER THIS

1. How do the goals/reasons of the First Nations compare to each other?

Most of the settled lands of Canada, in Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta, were transferred from First Nations to the Crown (the Government) through treaties.  

Today both sides agree that the so-called Indian Treaties are agreements between the Crown (the Government) and First Nations, in which the First Nations exchanged some of their interests in specific areas of their ancestral lands in return for various kinds of payments and promises from Crown officials. However, each side has a different interpretation of what was intended by the agreements.

The Canadians (British) and the First Nations were at the same meetings, listened to the same speeches (translated) and signed the same pieces of paper. Yet they had (and still have) two totally different concepts of what the treaties were about, and what each side was promising. The differences in understanding are rooted in two totally different world views, and two totally different concepts of land ownership, and two colliding purposes.

The concept of private ownership of land by an individual, who could build a fence and keep others out forever, was totally foreign to First Nations people.

First Nations had an oral tradition. They passed down important information by the spoken word during important ceremonies and at celebrations. What was said was what was important to them, not what was written on paper. Though they did not have a written tradition, in the European sense, they recorded important events by sewing beaded wampum belts. Wampum belts signifying treaties became sacred objects that were brought out at certain times, Then elders recited the terms and understandings of the agreement commemorated by that ceremonial wampum belt.

The Government View of TreatiesThe First Nations View of Treaties

The British and Canadian governments saw treaties as a way to legalize the ceding of Indian lands to clear the way for European settlement, mining, and railways. Treaties were intended to extinguish all First Nations claims and rights to their land forever, except in those lands set apart as Reserves of land for the bands to live on.  

In return, the government would make a one-time payment to the bands, plus a specified annual sum.

As well, treaties had terms dealing with hunting and fishing rights, as well as education and health care. Treaties were also intended to offer the Indians some protection from the consequences of new settlement, and some assistance in adapting to new ways of living as the old ways became less feasible.

Treaties were also expected to be the first step towards assimilation.

Government expected First Nations people to give up their culture, including their customs, their language, their religious beliefs, their ceremonies, and everything else that differentiated them from Canadians of British origin.

First Nations saw treaties in a different light. To them, treaties were solemn pacts establishing the future basis of relations between their people, for whom Canada is an ancient homeland, and the new Government of Canada and its people.

First Nations representatives signed the treaties to ensure that they would receive some government assistance in the future to ensure the survival of their people. They believed (because all the Treaty Commissioners told them so) that they would be cherished and protected by the Crown with whom they had a special relationship.  

Explanation:

Views of Land OwnershipLeadership & Consensus

Europeans had a concept that land could be divided up into packages, and individually owned and controlled, by an individual, a company, or the government. Individuals or companies could create wealth from the land they owned by farming it, mining it, exploiting it for other commercial purposes, or renting it to others.  

First Nations, however, recognized only group rights to land, not individual rights. They respected territorial rights of other tribes, but not individual rights to control a package of land.

Tribes recognized tribal right to certain regions of land, and did not intrude uninvited onto other tribes' territories, except in war. However, First Nations people did not divide land up into packages that could be "owned" or controlled by individuals.

First Nations people also regarded their lands and the plants and animals on those lands as a sacred trust to cherish for future generations.

In Canada, the Primary Countries are the overwhelming inborn people groups in Canada south of the ... In conjunction with other Anicinapek, they arrived at the "Primary Halting Put" close ... The Nuu-chah-nulth are one of the Inborn people groups of the Pacific ... The points of the organization are to secure the rights.

Explanation:

can I have brainliest plsss I really need it

answer: faithfulness can be meaning to feel loved and promising. god shows that to everybody. the only thing he needs is for people to believe it too.

explanation:

he wants people to feel as if when they’re giving up there is no reason for people to stand in the way of it and not try and make a change of it all.

i disagree that there is little difference between adult female development and adult male development. sociological studies comparing female and male pathways to adulthood, revelead that there are sustancial differences between them. particularly, female and male differ from timing of marriage, when they began to live with children and the likelihood of combining wife/husband and parent roles.