Suppose a classmate claims that the reason he knows nothing about politics is rational ignorance. What does he mean

He meant that he doesn't know anything about politics since he doesn't want to try to grasp it, preferring instead to remain in a state of non-knowledge and, as a result, reasonable ignorance.

When the perceived expense of educating oneself on a topic exceeds the predicted potential advantage that knowledge would give, rational ignorance is the result.

About Rational ignorance:

For more information about Rational ignorance refer to the link:

link

He meant that he doesn't know anything about politics because he doesn't want to try to understand about it, preferring to keep non-knowledge and, therefore, rational ignorance.

Explanation:

Rational ignorance is the term that refers to the human being's ability to keep believing in a wrong or insufficient concept, as he does not want to bear the search for information and the costs to better inform himself about this concept and understand it efficiently, that is, to an individual in a rational way and by his own choice, he prefers to remain ignorant about a certain subject.

In this case, when someone says that he does not know anything about politics because of rational ignorance, it means that he knows that his knowledge of politics is insufficient, but he or she prefers to continue like this, because he does not want to be informed about politics.

european feudalism was a combination of legal and military customs in medieval europe that flourished between the 9th and 15th centuries. broadly defined, it was a way of structuring society around relationships derived from the holding of land in exchange for service or labour.

japanese feudalism. the era of feudalism in japan took place from the 12th through 19th centuries. during that period local rulers, either powerful families or military warlords, dominated the land, while the emperor was merely a figurehead and not a significant political presence.

buildings

explanation: