subject
Social Studies, 11.12.2020 04:10 santileiva123199

80 points marking brainlist Are you living a meaningful life? ...
What's the one thing you cannot live without? ...
When is it acceptable, if ever, to disobey the law? ...
What do you want your final words to be? ...
What inspires you the most? ...
What do you think are the 5 most beautiful things in the world?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30
Isaiah is a citizen of florida. he would like to propose a new amendment to his state's constitution to be voted on in the next election. is isaiah able to do this? no. the u.s. and florida constitutions do not allow citizens to add amendments to the state or federal ballot. no. the florida constitution says citizens may only propose new laws or amendments at local government meetings. yes. the florida and u.s. constitutions allow citizens to add amendments to be voted on in the next federal election. yes. the florida constitution allows citizens to propose amendments to the state constitution to be voted on in the next state election.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 08:00
When a government has total control over its citizens, including the media, it is a of government question 2 options: constitutional monarchy parliamentary democracy autocracy presidential democracy
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 13:30
As bob is driving on an exit off the freeway, he comes to a stop light and sees a homeless man asking people for spare change. “see, he’s a perfect example of why we shouldn’t be giving welfare benefits to the homeless,” bob mutters to his wife. “he’s too lazy to get a job, but he’s healthy enough to beg people for their hard-earned money all day long.” what are the sample and the target in bob’s argument? are there any inductive fallacies present in bob’s reasoning (bias, hastiness, appeal to anecdotal evidence, self-selection)? if so, explain why. if not, explain why not.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 15:00
Norman jones, an economic historian at the university of utah, has described the views of the ancient greek philosopher aristotle on interest: aristotle defined money as a good that was consumed by use. unlike houses and fields, which are not destroyed by use, money must be spent to be used. there- fore, as we cannot rent food, so we cannot rent money. moreover, money does not reproduce. a house or a flock can produce new value by use, so it is not unreasonable to ask for a return on their use. money, being barren, should not, therefore, be expected to produce excess value. thus, interest is unnatural. what did aristotle mean in arguing that money is “barren”? why would money being barren mean that lenders should not charge interest on loans? do you agree with aristotle’s reasoning? briefly explain.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
80 points marking brainlist Are you living a meaningful life? ...
What's the one thing you ca...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 13.10.2019 06:10
question
Biology, 13.10.2019 06:10