subject
Social Studies, 10.12.2020 17:30 BobreyesV20

Which statements accurately describe worms? Check all that apply. Worms have a head.
Worms have a tail.
Worms have legs.
Worms are vertebrates.
Worms are bilaterally symmetrical.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:30
The process of learning acceptable social behavior and values is called
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:40
Imagine a child who consistently gets mediocre grades and is often picked last for a team when games are played at recess. however, he likes to make silly jokes and play pranks, and he notices that people laugh when he does those things. the child starts to think that others are laughing with him, not at him. this is part of the process that charles cooley
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:10
Which best explains why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. ferguson was unconstitutional? the supreme court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the us, the supreme court’s decision could not be applied. the supreme court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to non-whites. since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Which statements accurately describe worms? Check all that apply. Worms have a head.
Worms ha...
Questions