subject
Social Studies, 07.12.2020 02:10 lizz1228

NICKEL AND DIMED In Ehrenreich’s opinion, what do preemployment tests look for in a potential employee? A. someone who is independent and creative B. someone who has a solid educational background C. someone who understands that there is a hierarchy in the workplace, and that an employee should not keep secrets from management D. someone who doesn’t want to remain in an entry-level job but aspires to move up the company ladder into a management position E. someone who is candid and will admit openly if they have a criminal record or other less desirable background information

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:30
Identify the example of when situation and time are key to assessing risk of harm in a research study: a study on the efficacy of a behavioral intervention for smoking cessation involves both adults and teenagersasking women if they have had an abortionresearch on the prevalence of hiv-infected individuals in communitiesa survey about sexually transmitted diseases
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:30
Me 1. identify countries 2 and 3 shown above. a) australia and samoa b) samoa and vanutu c) micronesia and samoa d) new zealand and new guinea
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:30
Supreme court. jim, who is a bit eccentric, says that he is fed up with the way a certain employer in his town treats employees and that he is going to sue that employer in an effort to improve matters. jim also says that he is going to start his case at the appellate court level, skipping over all those "lesser" judges. jim says that those justices will surely hear him out and that he will also seek a jury. although he is not a lawyer, jim believes that the offenses of the employer are so severe that the justices will appreciate his attempt to make things better for the employees involved. will jim get a jury at the appellate court level?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
NICKEL AND DIMED In Ehrenreich’s opinion, what do preemployment tests look for in a potential employ...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 21.04.2020 09:20
question
Biology, 21.04.2020 09:20
question
Advanced Placement (AP), 21.04.2020 09:20