A significant component of evaluation in critical reasoning and critical thinking is the ability to an issue, collect information, develop reasoning, and to evaluate an argument.

identify

Explanation:

Critical reasoning is the ability to reason on something critically. This process includes the ability to diligently and smartly theorize, analyze, raise question, and assess ideas and beliefs. Critical reasoning involves questioning the beliefs and ideas of someone or oneself.

Critical thinking, on the other hand, requires reflective thinking. Such perception helps to think reasonably and clearly.

The common component of evaluation in critical reasoning and critical thinking is the ability to identify an issue, collect data, develop reasoning, and to assess an argument.

So, the correct word to fill the blank is identify.

the correct answer is option c. elenita versus "early puerto rican decor" is the best example, out of all the options, of a cultural conflict. a cultural conflict is defined as what happens when different cultures, that have different values and believes, clash. elenita not liking or accepting the puerto rican style of decoration, would represent that she does not identify herself with the puerto rican culture, therefore does not want to have decorations influenced by that culture.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.