PLZ HELPp I BEGGING YOUTHIS DUE TODAY AND I NEED YOUR HELP PLZ DON'T TROLL Nieu Amsterdam, mid 17th-century

QUESTION: In what ways does the PICTURE describe issues of power, wealth, or morality?

Be sure to cite evidence from the PICTURE that supports your answer and explain why it supports your answer. Use the RADD process to help answer this question

This is my answer

Explanation:

It describes issues of Power, because if you pay close attention to the people in the back, they are working as slaves and have a master who has power and strength over them.

Issues of Wealth because the two people in the front have expensive clothes an accesorys such as hats, and fancy shoes while the people in the back only have a white cloth to cover themselves.

Hope this helps, sorry if this is bad I was in a rush.

answer:

d. because dr. laguardia selected a widely used measure, his study generalizes to has strong external validity. external validity has limited external validity. other applications of this measure.

the widely used measure that he applied to his experiment was the benton facial recognition test. it employed on to football players and as result, only players who suffered brain concussions did not pas this test. and although it has an external validity, it is limited because it isn't general to apply to other population.

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals