subject
Social Studies, 26.11.2020 17:20 8hoofs

When people lose rights that facilitate their ability to be employed or to be participate in family activities to further their overall well-being, this dynamic is referred to as a. Human rights
b. Healthy disparity
c. Social inequality
d. Social deprivation.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 14:30
Which of the following is not part of the president’s responsibilities as party leader? a. raise money for the party b. represent the interests of the party c. support other party members up for election d. removing members of opposing parties from congress
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:30
What happened in the 2000 election of al gore vs bush
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:00
Why was george washington being elected unanimously important? it indicated how much respect and popularity he had gained. it paved the way for other unanimous elections. it meant that he would be president forever. it meant that he voted for himself.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
When people lose rights that facilitate their ability to be employed or to be participate in family...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 12.02.2020 04:46
question
Mathematics, 12.02.2020 04:46
question
Mathematics, 12.02.2020 04:46