Does the Necessary and proper clause quoted in this excerpt comfort or upset the author? Why?

1. The author uses the words "undefined", "unbounded" and "immense" to describe the powers of the constitution.

2. Upset: it makes the Congress even more powerful than it’s previous long list of expressed powers

3. A Bill of Rights is necessary to protect the rights of citizens. The proposed Constitution does not do enough.  

4. Yes he does, and it matters because if you don’t trust the people in power you wouldn’t have a real nation.

5.He seems more like an Anti-Federalist.

Part Two

1. Unnecessary and dangerous

2. From the Federalist No.84

3. No because he believes that its unnecessary and not needed in the constitution.

4. That the bill of rights is pointless and not realistic for the American people.

5 He is defiantly Anti-Federalist; He goes against everything Federalism is for.

answer is b shrapnel injuries

answer; /// the correct answer is (belongingness needs; good luck