What is a correct assumption historians make when they evaluate a source of information? They know an eyewitness report will be free of bias.
They know an eyewitness report will always be accurate.
They know an expert will provide the most accurate information.
They know a student who did research will be the most accurate source.

For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes

When children heard an interesting story about a sympathetic and resourceful african-american child, the aim was to provide them with?

Segregation or discriminatory practices that occur even when there is no explicit legal enforcement