THIS IS 10PTS. Give me a Solid argument FOR or AGAINST that includes your claim and evidence for your reasoning about Amendment 76: Citizenship Qualification of Voters. NO COPYING AND PASTING.

The amendment 76 "aims to solve a problem that doesn’t exist." One, it only changes one word of the Colorado constitution from "every citizen" to "only citizen". Two, this would would go against the Colorado Votes Act which allows 17 who will be 18 to vote in primary elections. So, this can lead them not to vote when they do turn 18. Three, from what I can see for amendment 76 is supress voters. “What it’s going to do is it’s going to open the door for limited voting like voter ID requirements.” So, this amendment has no benefits that I can see and only causes more issues than it is "solving". So, I am against amendment 76 because it only supresses voters and can lead people to not vote.

Explanation:

Do you need more?

answer:

d. because dr. laguardia selected a widely used measure, his study generalizes to has strong external validity. external validity has limited external validity. other applications of this measure.

the widely used measure that he applied to his experiment was the benton facial recognition test. it employed on to football players and as result, only players who suffered brain concussions did not pas this test. and although it has an external validity, it is limited because it isn't general to apply to other population.

answer; community based corrections;