Why does tinker v. des moines remain an important precedent-setting case? it used symbolic speech in war protests. it applied prior restraint in schools. it established speech rights for students. it stopped students from stating unpopular opinions.

answer; /// i believe the correct answer is (when one group has an extremely high score at pretest;

chavez's example shows that nonviolent protest can work well. it shows that one nonviolent man can stop a mob, which proves chavez's point and persuades people to protest nonviolently.