The following question refers to a hypothetical situation.
The 2010 Supreme Court case, Wagner v. Tritch, involves the illegal distribution of copyrighted material to
foreign consumers via the Internet, which is a new area of law. The 9-0, unanimous vote on the Court is set to
overturn the lower appellate court decision that Augustus Tritch was liable for millions of dollars to the
plaintiff, Frederick Von Wagner, for illegally distributing his book to overseas customers. Now that the court
has voted on the case, explain what must happen next? Describe the different types of opinions that could
come from the Court.

if you have the sample response... that would be very helpful!

Awaiver of the requirement for documentation of informed consent may be granted when: the investigator has no convenient place to store signed consent forms separate from the research datathe only record linking the subject and the research is the consent document and the principal risk is a breach of confidentiality.potential subjects might find some of the research questions embarrassing, personal, or intrusivethe subjects are literate in their own language; however, they do not read, write, or speak english

How did the nazis lead germany to war in europe and, with their collaborators, kill millions—including systematically murdering six million jewish people?

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.