Ming is writing a paper on the American Revolution. She is using an article written by a historian who is an expert on the topic as one of her sources. Use the drop-down menus to answer the questions. Is the article a primary or secondary source? Is the article credible or not credible for Ming's purpose? Is the article a biased or neutral source?

The article is a secondary source

The article is credible because it was written by an expert

It is a neutral source

Explanation:

The article is a secondary source because the author was not an eyewitness or directly connected to the American Revolution as at the time it occurred.

However, the article is credible because it was written by an expert in the field hence it must contain reliable information.

The source will be a neutral source because the expert will present the issues fairly without bias.

well, i can't read it so i'll ask you questions about it : )

if you were a reader and you read the introduction, would you want to read more?

does it start with a question? if so, is it something you would want to read about?

and ask any friends or family for their opinion : )

answer; not counted as an offense known to the police;