Ano ang inig sabihin ng "maniwala sa sabi sabi ay walang bait sa sarili

Passport video produced a video documentary titled the definitive elvis, comprising sixteen one-hour episodes. the producers interviewed more than 200 people regarding virtually all aspects of elvis's life. passport sold the videos commercially for a profit. approximately 5 to 10 percent of the videos were composed of copyrighted music and appearances of presley on television and in movies owned by copyright holders other than passport. passport did not obtain permission to use those copyrighted works. elvis presley enterprises, inc., and other companies and individuals that owned copyrights to the presley works used by passport sued passport for copyright infringement. passport defended, arguing that its use of the copyrighted materials was fair use. the u.s. district court held in favor of the plaintiff copyright holders and enjoined passport from further distribution of its documentary videos. passport appealed.did passport act ethically in including the elvis presley copyrighted material in its video? why do you think passport video did so? has there been fair use in this case, or has there been copyright infringement?

Amember of congress acting as a trustee casts a vote for a bill based on his or her

What federal law makes marijuana illegal i know it's a schedule 1 drug but what law specifically gives the federal government the ability to arrest or fine you over marijuana i have only been able to find info on the scheduling of the drug but it never says this or that is illegal it just says that it's a schedule 1 drug i need the wording exactly my english teacher says that if i don't have it my paper is null and void