Imagine that you are a representative attending the secession debate in Georgia in 1861. In two paragraphs, explain whether or not Georgia should secede from the Union. Explain your argument using reasons and evidence. Remember, you are trying to convince others to share your point of view.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Georgia should secede from the Union. Explain your argument using reasons and evidence.

What I would share with the representatives of the state of Georgia would be this.

The state of Georgia must recognize the fact that in the past we agreed to be part of a great Union. Although the many differences caused by the issue of slavery, Georgia must show loyalty to the Union because divided, the United States will fail as a nation, and there is no sense to confront Americans against each other if we are one nation.  It would be to ask siblings in a family to fight each other.

The United States is greater than its differences. That is why we have the US Congress and the law, to pacifically resolve our issues. Furthermore, the economic consequences that secession would bring could really compromise the stability that we want for our people, not even thinking that a division could take us to a Civil War that nobody wants.  

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

aa

explanation:

literally the answer is aa. not kidding. aa is a group.