Social Studies, 18.10.2020 03:01 tony001

RIERI 2 W, SL 4 SL
Analyzing the Text
Cite Text Evidence
Support your responses with evidence from the texts.
1. Cause Effect which of the two texts would you use to research the
etects of the Triangle Fre? Why?
2. Compare Look back at both texts to find mention of Frances Perkins
Why is she an important person to know about?
3. Infer What kinds of sources did both authors use in researching this
4. Analyze History Writing Readlines 126-130 from Flesh & Blood So Cheap
Are these lines an example of author Albert Martin's perspective? Explain
why or why not
5. Analyze Tone Read lines 36-38 from The Story of the Triangle Factory Fire
What clues do you see in these lines to Zachary Kent's attitude about the
conditions that are described?
6. Connect What idea presented by both authors is most relevant to us
today? Why?
7. Analyze Key Information The two historical writings cover different
aspects of the same event. Briefly review each text for its key details Then
tell what each selection emphasizes.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 14:30

Which of the following is not part of the president’s responsibilities as party leader? a. raise money for the party b. represent the interests of the party c. support other party members up for election d. removing members of opposing parties from congress

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:00

Adefendant visited her doctor to seek treatment for a bullet wound. while he was treating the wound, the doctor asked the defendant how she was shot. the defendant replied that she was struck by a police officer’s bullet while running away from a jewelry store she had robbed, but she implored the doctor not to tell this to anyone. the doctor promised that he would not. although the defendant was never charged by the police, the owner of the jewelry store brought suit against her seeking the value of the stolen goods. the defendant denied robbing the store. at the trial, the owner calls the doctor to testify to the statement made to him by the defendant. the defense attorney objects on the ground that such testimony is barred by the jurisdiction’s physician-patient privilege. should the objection be sustained?

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:30

How can christianity affect the cultural landscape of a place?

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

RIERI 2 W, SL 4 SL
Analyzing the Text
Cite Text Evidence
Support your responses w...

Questions