subject
Social Studies, 17.10.2020 03:01 MSSTEALYOGURL3757

For these questions they are true or false if it is false put down the correct answer if it is true just put true. 1. An economic system called mercantilism was one of the reasons that Europeans wanted
to establish colonies in other lands.
2. France and Spain agreed to move the boundary line that divided the world's
non-Christian lands between them in the Treaty of Tordesillas.
3. Spanish expeditions into unknown lands included conquistadors, whose job was to
convert the native peoples to Christianity.
4. One of the first Europeans to realize that the Americas were not part of Asia was the
Italian explorer Amerigo Vespucci.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:00
What happened in georgia as a result of the supreme court ruling in brown v. board of education? question 3 options: the sibley commission was formed all public schools were desegregated the southern christian leadership was formed the general assembly passed laws to keep schools segregated.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:00
Which of the following items would serve as a primary source for a historian studiying the american civil war
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:50
The principle of checks and balances is based on the notion that
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
For these questions they are true or false if it is false put down the correct answer if it is true...
Questions
question
Biology, 16.07.2019 13:00
question
Mathematics, 16.07.2019 13:00