Who was the founder of south carolina, and what year was it founded?

These facilities were organized and sponsored by churches or charities during the great depression in an effort to feed the homeless and needy.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

6–6. business case problem with sample answer— criminal liability. during the morning rush hour, david green threw bottles and plates from a twenty-sixth- floor hotel balcony overlooking seventh avenue in new york city. a video of the incident also showed him doing cart- wheels while holding a beer bottle and sprinting toward the balcony while holding a glass steadily in his hand. when he saw police on the street below and on the roof of the building across the street, he suspended his antics but resumed tossing objects off the balcony after the police left. he later admitted that he could recall what he had done, but claimed to have been intoxicated and said his only purpose was to amuse himself and his friends. did green have the mental state required to establish criminal liability? discuss. [people v. green, 104 a.d.3d 126, 958 n.y.s.2d 138 (1 dept. 2013)] (see criminal liability.)