50 pts Please help in anyway possible! This is the hypothetical case I would like to use. •Congress passes a law to establish prior constraint on all social media. The federal government will install software on all devices that will approve all information before it is uploaded through any device.

1. What is the case about? What was the Supreme Court’s finding?

2. To which amendments does this case apply? Why?

3. Do you see in the keys the six principles of the Constitution, democratic concepts, or the changing nature of society? How?

4. What precedent does this establish for your case?

Afull irb committee meeting is convened and one agenda item is a new research proposal to evaluate how mothers interact with their learning-disabled child. the inclusion criteria require the children to be a minimum of five years of age. the protocol requires the mother of the child to look at the child without any expression and not to talk to the child for three minutes. the committee determined that the mother's required task may upset the child. the irb approved the study with appropriate language in the parental permission form regarding the possibility that children might become upset. after the start of the study, the principal investigator reports to the irb that, as expected, one of the children became upset. the incident was handled according to the protocol and the child is fine. what should the irb do with regard to this report?

Why is corruption not effectively reduced in nepal

Persons who have not yet attained the legal age of consent under the applicable laws in the jurisdiction in which the research was approved.persons who are under 18 years of age.persons who have not yet attained the legal age of consent under the applicable laws in the jurisdiction in which the research will be conducted.persons who are under 21 years of age.