Answers: 2
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00
Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. at her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and her two daughters if she did not. her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that karin had acted freely. instead, the judge told the jury that karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. who is correct?
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:00
Why would someone who is studying the history or culture of this time. find this text interesting important or useful?
Answers: 2
What is the different between 538 and 259...
Mathematics, 06.12.2020 14:00
Mathematics, 06.12.2020 14:00
English, 06.12.2020 14:00
English, 06.12.2020 14:00
Business, 06.12.2020 14:00
Chemistry, 06.12.2020 14:00
Mathematics, 06.12.2020 14:00
Biology, 06.12.2020 14:00
Mathematics, 06.12.2020 14:00
Biology, 06.12.2020 14:00
Mathematics, 06.12.2020 14:00
English, 06.12.2020 14:00
Mathematics, 06.12.2020 14:00
History, 06.12.2020 14:00