Social Studies, 03.09.2020 02:01 journeyhile5
Who said it? Match the statement on the right to the person on the left.
I-"I'm going out to meet these new settlers, it will be good for us to cooperate with each other. 2- "We have finally arrived I need to find a good spot near a river for our colony "
3-"I am so grateful for the chance to start a new life in the colony of Georgia"
4-"Oglethorpe needs me to help him communicate. If not, we may have serious problems."
5-"We would like to settle in Georgia and we have a doctor in our group."
6-" Sure we will come to Georgia and help you fight back the Spanish."
7-"we want rum, slaves, and no limits on land ownership"
The Choose are Highland scots, The jews settlers or Malcontents
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:30
The year is 1776. the family of philosopher john locke has brought a lawsuit against thomas jefferson for copying locke's ideas. locke's family claim that jefferson's "declaration of independence" plagiarizes locke's ideas from two treatises on government. you are the judge ruling on the case. you must research how jefferson's ideas compare to locke's and determine whether or not jefferson is guilty of stealing locke's ideas. your paragraph opinion (a court document explaining how you arrived at your decision on a case) should contain the following: explain at least 2 ideas of jefferson and locke that are similar explain at least 1 idea of jefferson that is different from locke's determine whether or not jefferson is guilty of plagiarism explain why or why not ~~ you don't have to do the work for me but i really would like some with this, you ! ( if you would like to do it for me that's great too : )
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:30
What was the main idea behind the daoist religion? a. everyone's life was guided by moral behavior. b. to live peacefully meant to live a life of suffering. c. family should be put above all else. d. all things should follow the flow of nature.
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00
Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. at her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and her two daughters if she did not. her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that karin had acted freely. instead, the judge told the jury that karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. who is correct?
Answers: 1
Who said it? Match the statement on the right to the person on the left.
I-"I'm going out to meet t...
Mathematics, 14.05.2021 20:50
Chemistry, 14.05.2021 20:50
Biology, 14.05.2021 20:50
Mathematics, 14.05.2021 20:50
Spanish, 14.05.2021 20:50
History, 14.05.2021 20:50
History, 14.05.2021 20:50
Mathematics, 14.05.2021 20:50
English, 14.05.2021 20:50
Biology, 14.05.2021 20:50