GIVING 60 POINTS! PLEASE HELP ME! Now, you will answer an essay question testing your knowledge of economics in a comprehensive essay prompt. This will require you to take all of the information you have learned and apply it to a problem. Consider yourself a local business person, opening up a new bakery in your town. Think about the things you would have to consider when planning out your business. Write an essay answering the following questions in an organized format: 1) What resources will you need from the market? 2) What would you offer in the market? 3) How would the government impact your business? 4) What kind of opportunity costs and trade-offs would you face? Answer these questions in paragraph form. This means, your essay should include an opening paragraph, a paragraph for each question, and a closing paragraph. This makes your essay six paragraphs.

What is one main reason some governments in the twentieth century began campaigns of genocide? a) a minority group wanted total independence. b) a minority group wanted more say in lawmaking. c) a minority group had different cultural customs. d)a minority group protested against government policy.

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?

Why is corruption not effectively reduced in nepal