If a text book describing the civil rights movement is it primary or secondary?

Secondary

Explanation:

The author didn't experience the civil rights movement. They are just taking information from other sources.

It is secondary

Explanation:

There are three types of sources:

1) Primary Sources

Original materials that provide direct evidence or first-hand testimony concerning a topic or event.

Primary sources can be contemporary sources created at the time when the event occurred (e.g., letters and newspaper articles) or later (such as, memoirs and oral history interviews).

Primary sources may be published or unpublished. Unpublished sources are unique materials (e.g., family papers) often referred to as archives and manuscripts.

What constitutes a primary source varies by discipline. How the researcher uses the source generally determines whether it is a primary source or not.

2) Secondary Sources

Works that interpret, analyze, and discuss the evidence provided by primary sources (e.g., scholarly books and articles).

Secondary sources are generally a second-hand account or observation at least one step removed from the event.

Secondary sources, however, can be considered to be primary sources depending on the context of their use. For example, Ken Burns' documentary of the Civil War is a secondary source for Civil War researchers, but a primary source for those studying documentary filmmaking.

3) Tertiary Sources

Books or articles that synthesize or distill primary and secondary sources, often in a convenient, easy-to-read form (e.g., dictionaries, encyclopedias, indexes, and textbooks).

a debit card i would say, but it would be to have choices.

explanation: