Why is characterizing Kagan’s view as an "atheist" view a misnomer according to him?

Because his vision uses the appeal to God.

Explanation:

For Kagan, an atheistic view could not make use of the appeal to God, since the atheist is opposed to any measure of this deity, his deeds and the ways of reaching him. In that case, it is totally inappropriate to call his view an atheist. This is because Jagan is not oppressed in using the appeal to God in his speeches and his views on religiosity and the influence of God today.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.