How did the treaties ending World War 1 sow the seeds for future conflict?

You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.

Plz me asap! and plz put a real answer! which of the following best describes richard russell's contribution to the war effort? by serving on the senate's naval affairs committee, he investigators learn how the pearl harbor attack was carried out. by to establish military bases like georgia's fort benning, he the state become an important resource to the federal government. by traveling to the war's regions, he develop maps of europe and the pacific. by working with his state's shipyards, he was able to obtain federal contracts to supply the military with ships built in savannah and brunswick.

The conflict perspective explains deviance in terms of power and inequality. select the best answer from the choices provided t f