A concurring opinion explains why the Court accepted the case in the first place. is a separate view written by a justice who votes with the majority but disagrees with its reasoning. is delivered when at least two justices, but less than a majority, hold the same opinion in a case. is delivered when the Court interprets a constitutional issue. explains the chief justice's position on a case.

is a separate view written by a justice who votes with the majority but disagrees with its reasoning.

Explanation:

A Concurring Opinion is a term in law that explains the position of a Justice, who is in support or agreement with the decision of the majority, but whose reason is different from that of the opinions of the majority.

Hence, a Concurring Opinion is a term in law that describes a separate view written by a justice who votes with the majority but disagrees with its reasoning.

hello,

answer: a federal government has final authority on interstate/inter provincial  and international affairs, a confederation is one where the central/national government or authority is governing body what does not have final say over the same matters. hopefully this and i will try again if you don't like this answer : )

best of luck!