During an extravagant banquet Belshazzar saw a divine handwritten message that appeared on the plaster wall of the palace. This message indicated that his kingdom had been numbered, weighted, and divided. a. True
b. False

True

Explanation:

According to the books of Daniel, during an extravagant banquet, King Belshazzar saw a divine handwritten message ( mene, mene, tekel, upharsin ) that appeared on the plaster wall of the palace after Belshazzar desecrated the temple vessels taken from Jerusalem by his father. The written words found on the wall were translated by prophet Daniel to mean that his kingdom had been numbered, weighed, and divided ( daniel 5:25-28). The prophet Daniel analysis and interprets the written words for king Belshazzar as God's judgment on the king MENE: God has numbered the days of his kingdom and brought it to an end

TEKEL: You have been weighed on the scales and found wanting

PERES: your kingdom is divided and given to the Medes and Persians.

It came to pass that very night that his kingdom was taken by the  Medes and Persians.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

answer; cindy crawford tina feycarrie underwood///meryl streep;