Psychological reactance occurs when: Group of answer choices someone verbally attacks us and we verbally counterattack group members change the subject even though you clearly want to continue discussing the topic group members respond to you the way you communicate with them---praise elicits praise and criticism provokes criticism the more someone tries to control us, the more we are inclined to resist such efforts, even do what we are told not to do

Correct

the more someone tries to control us, the more we are inclined to resist such efforts, even do what we are told not to do

Explanation:

Psychological reactance is unpleasant arousal or reaction of people or group of people to other people, rules, or regulations that threaten or eliminate their specific behavioral freedoms.

This occurs when a person feels that someone or something is taking away their choices in life or limiting the range of alternatives naturally available to them leading to them becoming upset, distressed, angry, or emotionally charged.

For example, teenagers who are told by their parents that they cannot attend a party on the weekend. Even if the teenagers originally had no intention of attending the party, once they are told they cannot, they will desire going to the party more than before.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

first of all, it's important to say that the book we shall not be moved, written by joan dash, is about the first strike of women in the united states in the year 1909. the best historical detail to clarify the reader's undertanding is the phrase "general strike". this strike involved women working at a garment factory who decided to protest   long working hours, low wages and brutal conditions. this strike became known as "the new york shirtwaist strike" or "the uprising of the 20,000". the strike mostly involved jewish women who did not speak english or who had a basic knowledge of the english language. finally, the strike went on from november 1909 until february 1910.