Social Studies, 18.07.2020 02:01 mine9226

The defendant was on trial for driving while intoxicated and injuring a pedestrian. The pedestrian claimed that the defendant was driving the car; however, the defendant's spouse testified at trial that she had been driving the car at the time of the accident and had not consumed any alcohol that evening. In response, the prosecution calls a friend of the defendant's spouse to testify that the spouse told the friend that she and the defendant had changed seats in the car after the incident and that she remained in the driver's seat until the police arrived. Is the testimony admissible? A. Admissible for impeachment purposes only.
B. Admissible to show bias.
C. In-admissible, because a witness who is available to testify can be impeached only through cross-examination.
D. In-admissible, because the witness must be given an opportunity to explain or deny the statement.

.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:20

Base your answer for this question on the statement below and on your knowledge of social studies.my fellow citizens, events in iraq have now reached the final days of decision. for more than a decade, the united states and other nations have pursued patient and honorable efforts to disarm the iraqi regime without war. that regime pledged to reveal and destroy all its weapons of mass destruction as a condition for ending the persian gulf war in 1991.…— president george w. bush, march 17, 200344 which action did president george w. bush take following this statement?

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:50

According to bowers, which of the following best describes the dominance of interest groups in the state of nevada over time? political machines dominated during the first 50 years; from 1908 to 1958 railroad and mining interests dominated; primarily gaming interests from 1958 to the present. the railroad and mining interests dominated during the first 50 years of statehood; political machines dominated from 1908 to 1958; primarily gaming interests have dominated from 1958 to present. gaming interests have always dominated. railroad and mining interests dominated from statehood until 1959; gaming interests have dominated from 1959 to present. no one interest has ever dominated at any one time.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00

Why did alexander hamilton support high tariffs?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30

Which of the following situations best demonstrates the principle of separation of powers in the u.s. government? a. the president can veto laws passed by the legislature. b. the courts must approve constitutional amendments. c. states create their own educational policies. d. members of the legislature are elected by voters.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

The defendant was on trial for driving while intoxicated and injuring a pedestrian. The pedestrian c...

Questions