Social Studies, 14.06.2020 03:57 hooplikenari

How could the state have attempted to ensure that fracking continued?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30

The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:30

There are 25 elements found in living things. how many of these elements are found in some organisms but not all? 1 , 6 , 19 , 25

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:30

1. georgia constitution is adopted 2. radical reconstruction ends in georgia 3. atlanta becomes the official state capital 4. jefferson franklin long becomes the 1st black congressman from georgia what is the correct sequence of events? a) 1, 3, 2, 4 b) 1, 2, 3, 4 c) 3, 1, 4, 2 d) 4, 2, 3, 1

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:40

Ageneral requirement for informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject’s legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language? taking part in the research is voluntary, but if you choose to take part, you waive the right to legal redress for any research-related injuries.your participation in this research is voluntary. if you choose not to participate, or change your mind later, your decision will not affect your relationship with the researcher or your right to other services that you may be eligible for.in the event of any distress you may have related to this research, you will be given access to appropriate resources.the researcher may stop you from taking part in this research without your consent if you experience side effects that make your emotional condition worse. if you become too emotionally distressed during the research, you may have to drop out.