Should children (technically under 16) be held responsible for the crimes they commit? Why or why not?

No

Explanation:

Children under 16 should not be held responsible for crimes they commit because (1)they were probably raised into thinking that doing so was ok, and, (2) you need to hear all sides of a story, and even though people might not believe kids, a lot of times there's a good reason behind a bad mistake.

answer; /// the only one thats make little sense is (c) fair credit billing act;

the answer is "meiosis ii in the mother".

the procedure of meiosis includes two divisions of the hereditary material. the main division is known as the decrease division – or meiosis i – on the grounds that it lessens the quantity of chromosomes from 46 chromosomes or 2n to 23 chromosomes or (n depicts a solitary chromosome set). in people, the decrease division results in two sperm cells each with 23 chromosomes or an egg cell with 23 chromosomes and one disposed of polar body. the second division – or meiosis ii – is called equational division. the two sperm cells split again creating four sperm cells, each with 23 or n chromosomes. in oogenesis, the egg cell and polar body partition to shape the ovum and two extra polar bodies. along these lines, the posterity are guaranteed to get one portion of the chromosomes from the mother and one half from the dad.