Would it be possible to have a socialist direct democracy? why or why not? no, in a socialist society only a few high-ranking members of the communist party have political power. no, a direct democracy requires a free market economy which is not socialist. yes, if everyone voted on economic decisions rather than letting markets decide them, then it could be considered a socialist direct democracy. yes, if the society was ruled by a king who made the majority of economic decisions, it could be considered a socialist direct democracy.

Which of the following selections is least useful for supporting the claim that states intentionally built unequal school systems? question 1 options: the supreme court ruling in plessy v. ferguson (1896) wrote into law that america had two separate societies: one black and one white. it was very clear by the mid-1900s that southern states had expertly built separate educational systems. these schools, however, were never equal. states with laws keeping schools segregated never gave equal amounts of money to their black and white schools. ten years after brown, fewer than 10 percent of southern public schools had integrated. some areas did not comply at all.