An auto factory in the United States buys steel from within the U. S. to make frames for cars. Plastic and rubber parts for the cars are made in Mexico and shipped to the United States. The parts are assembled in an American factory. The finished cars travel to Colombia in an importer's shipping container. Once in Colombia, the cars are sold to auto dealerships who will resell them to consumers.
Which transaction is most likely to involve an exchange of currency? (1 point)

An importer brings the cars to Colombia.

The cars are sold to consumers at a dealership in Colombia.

The auto factory buys American steel to make frames.

The Mexican and American parts are assembled to make finished cars.

How did the government of ancient athens differ from that of the early romans? (5 point) in athens, citizens voted for representatives who voted on issues, while in rome, citizens voted directly on issues. in athens, citizens voted directly on issues, while in rome, citizens voted for representatives who voted on issues. in athens, the government was ruled by a small group of powerful people, while in rome, the government was ruled by kings. in athens, the government was ruled by kings, while in rome, the government was ruled by a small group of powerful people.

Ageneral requirement for the informed consent form is that it may not include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject's legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language? a general requirement for the informed consent form is that it may not include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject's legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language?

The decision states that legislation cannot overcome social prejudice. can it reinforce social prejudice? how?