What is the relationship between foreign involvement in Korea and Vietnam in the 1950s – 1970s, and the Domino Theory?

Question 1 options:

a)

The Domino Theory states that if one country became a democracy, its neighbors would become democratic as well. Great Britain became involved in India in order to support the spread of democracy.

b)

The Domino Theory states that if one country fell to communism, its neighbors would fall to communism as well. Great Britain became involved in India to stop the spread of communism.

c)

The Domino Theory states that if one country became a democracy, its neighbors would become democratic as well. The United States became involved in Korea and Vietnam in order to support the spread of democracy.

d)

The Domino Theory states that if one country fell to communism, its neighbors would fall to communism as well. The United States became involved in Korea and Vietnam to stop the spread of communism.

You think all professors are uncoordinated, but then you see your social psychology professor make a diving catch down the left-field line at an intramural softball game against the arts department team. you also notice that your professor hits lead-off for the team and is able to score from second base on a ground-out. you maintain your original stereotype of professors as uncoordinated by deciding that this one individual is an exception to the rule because he is a “young professor.” this is an example of

“dear sir: it is with great reluctance, i trouble you on a subject, which does not fall within your province; but it is a subject that occasions me more distress, than i have felt, since the commencement of the war; and which loudly demands the most zealous exertions of every person of weight and authority, who is interested in the success of our affairs. i mean the present dreadful situation of the army for want of provisions, and the miserable prospects before us, with respect to futurity. it is more alarming than you will probably conceive, for, to form a just idea, it were necessary to be on the spot. for some days past, there has been little less, than a famine in camp. a part of the army has been a week, without any kind of flesh, and the rest for three or four days. naked and starving as they are, we cannot enough admire the incomparable patience and fidelity of the soldiery, that they have not been ere this excited by their sufferings, to a general mutiny or dispersion. strong symptoms, however, discontent have appeared in particular instances; and nothing but the most acitive efforts every where can long avert so shocking a catastrophe.” what’s the central idea?

Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. at her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and her two daughters if she did not. her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that karin had acted freely. instead, the judge told the jury that karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. who is correct?