Suppose that U. S. citizens purchase more cars made in Korea, and Koreans purchase more bonds issued by U. S. corporations. Other things the same, these actions

A. lower U. S. net exports and raise U. S. net capital outflows.
B. raise U. S. net exports and lower U. S. net capital outflows.
C. raise both U. S. net exports and U. S. net capital outflows.
D. lower both U. S. net exports and U. S. net capital outflows.

In russia, after the soviet union collapse, influential retained power by acquiring large numbers of , so the ruling class gained power in place of power.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

Why would someone who is studying the history or culture of this time. find this text interesting important or useful?