subject
Social Studies, 24.04.2020 18:01 mimi8561

In Raul's dream, he flew out the window of his car and up into the clouds. Raul's therapist interprets this dream to mean that Raul is feeling a strong need to be free "as a bird" rather than being tied down by his family and work responsibilities.

This therapist's interpretation of Raul's dream is revealing which type of dream content?

a. NREM
b. lucid
c. manifest
d. latent

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:00
What were some benefits of the lewis and clark expedition?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:00
  following the agreement that was reached in the treaty of indian springs in 1825, chief william mcintosh lost his life. why did this happen
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 15:00
Norman jones, an economic historian at the university of utah, has described the views of the ancient greek philosopher aristotle on interest: aristotle defined money as a good that was consumed by use. unlike houses and fields, which are not destroyed by use, money must be spent to be used. there- fore, as we cannot rent food, so we cannot rent money. moreover, money does not reproduce. a house or a flock can produce new value by use, so it is not unreasonable to ask for a return on their use. money, being barren, should not, therefore, be expected to produce excess value. thus, interest is unnatural. what did aristotle mean in arguing that money is “barren”? why would money being barren mean that lenders should not charge interest on loans? do you agree with aristotle’s reasoning? briefly explain.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In Raul's dream, he flew out the window of his car and up into the clouds. Raul's therapist interpre...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 09.12.2019 08:31
question
Social Studies, 09.12.2019 08:31
question
Social Studies, 09.12.2019 08:31
question
Mathematics, 09.12.2019 08:31