In the nineteenth century, various sections of the united states had conflicting desires for how the national economy should develop. for example, westerners wanted, (a. high, b. low, c. moderate) land prices in the west because they wanted to(slow down westward migration, establish slavery there, encourage farmers to settle there) . northerners wanted, (a. high, b. low, c. moderate) land prices in the west because they wanted to, (a. keep there workers from moving west, b. complete with the southern economy, c. boost the real estate industry). **fill in the blank**

i bought a new phone

explanation:

i will send you the money when i get back from lunch

i disagree that there is little difference between adult female development and adult male development. sociological studies comparing female and male pathways to adulthood, revelead that there are sustancial differences between them. particularly, female and male differ from timing of marriage, when they began to live with children and the likelihood of combining wife/husband and parent roles.

whats the question huh huh bruh

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.