Which of the following statements is true regarding effects of culture on change effects? People in the United States tend to see themselves as subjugated to their environment and thus will tend to take a passive approach toward change. In cultures in which people believe that they can dominate their environment, individuals will tend to take a passive approach toward change. People in high power distance cultures prefer champions to work closely with those in authority to approve innovative activities before work is begun. As compared to people from the United States, people from China are more likely to seek change programs that promise fast results. People in the United States are more resistant to change efforts than their Italian counterparts.

A powerful culture can project the changes in the organization form of environment and changes confers to the value of stability and these organization can adapt rapidly to the changes. Find their value necessary to change and resist.

Hence the option A is correct,

Learn more about the following statements is true regarding effects.

link.

People in the US are resistant to change because they believe their way of life does not need change.

Explanation:

As given, In cultures in which people believe that they can dominate their environment, individuals will tend to take a passive approach toward change. US is one of the cultures that takes pride in its past achievement and does not want to change that way of life that had led them there.

Ironically, the time of the progress in US was marked by such innovations that have defined the nations like China in the modern world now.

This is something that is hard to realize on a cultural term.

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.

i took very good i wish you luck! i hope it .