subject
Social Studies, 21.04.2020 03:48 jgomez042202

Economist: The most economically efficient way to reduce emissions of air pollutants is to tax them in proportion to the damage they are likely to cause. But in Country Y, many serious pollutants are untaxed and unregulated, and policy makers strongly oppose new taxes. Therefore, the best way to achieve a reduction in air pollutant emissions in Country Y would be to institute fixed upper limits on them. Which of the following is an assumption of the economist's argument?
(A) Policy makers in Country Y oppose all new taxes equally strongly, regardless of any benefits they may provide.
(B) Country Y's air pollutant emissions world not fall significantly it they were taxed in proportion to the damage they are likely to cause.
(C) Policy makers in Country Y strongly favor reductions in an pollutant emissions.
(D) Country Y's policy makers believe that air pollutant emissions should be reduced with maximum economic efficiently
(E) Policy makers in Country Y do not oppose setting fixed upper limits on air pollutant emissions as strongly as they oppose new taxes.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:00
What effect did the lawpassed by parlament have on the .
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:00
What is another name for the spanish navy in 1588? a) spanish royal fleet b) spanish armada c) spanish yacht crew d) spanish tall ships
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30
Should the u.s limit the number of terms a lawmaker serves in the u.s congress 5 paragraph response argumentative
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:40
What body has the power to impeach the president
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Economist: The most economically efficient way to reduce emissions of air pollutants is to tax them...
Questions
question
History, 23.02.2021 22:40
question
Mathematics, 23.02.2021 22:40
question
World Languages, 23.02.2021 22:40