Egbert, age sixteen, purchases a $500 video-game system and a $50 computer chair from CompuStore. Egbert changes his mind and wants to avoid the contract for the video-game system but not the computer chair. Egbert may:

Egbert may disaffirm the contract for the video game  on the basis that it is a non necessity item.

Explanation:

Egbert may disaffirm the contract of the video game, on the basis that the video game is a non necessity item for him, while claiming that computer chair is a necessity item that will aid him in learning or education.

Note that disaffirmance is a legal term that refers to the right for one party to renounce a contract.

This is a term often used by minor to make a contract of non necessary items to be void. It is often explicitly or verbally expressed by the person (minor)in a declaration or implied when the person involved decides not to abide by the terms of the contract.

question 1:

senate and house of representatives

i would try to answer the second question but i’m not 100% positive but i hope i

answer; evidence; reverseremand;