Which case had the most significant effect on the balance of power between federal and state governments? Why was this case more significant than the others you researched?

New York vs the U.S. case.

(Check the last paragraph for the second part).

Explanation:

There have been many cases between the state government and the federal government in which the federal government wants to dominate the stats government. One of the cases that had the most significant effect on the balance of power between federal and state governments is that of the New York vs the U.S. case.

In the New York vs the U.S. case, the federal government wants to force the state government to adopt the federal government policies and regulations concerning how radioactive waste are being disposed.

The case has more significant than the others I have researched because the United States of America practices Federalism and power most be balanced between the state and the federal government. The federal government has no power over the state government so it had no right to force the state government in adopting the regulation.

answer; ///i believe the state is (pennsylvania);

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )