3. What did President William Howard Taft mean when he wrote that "the President can exercise no power which cannot be fairly reasonably traced to some specific grant of power or justly implied and included within such express grant as proper and necessary to its exercise"? How does this compare with President Theodore Roosevelt’s argument? Compare their arguments. Which position comes closest to the experience of the modern presidency? (Please note that this is about the institution of the presidency in modern experience, not about an individual president). Which position do you prefer?

Explanation:

What did President William Howard Taft mean when he wrote that "the President can exercise no power which cannot be fairly reasonably traced to some specific grant of power or justly implied and included within such express grant as proper and necessary to its exercise"? How does this compare with President Theodore Roosevelt’s argument? Compare their arguments.Which position comes closest to the experience of the modern presidency? (Please note that this is about the institution of the presidency in modern experience, not about an individual president). Which position do you prefer?

The president can express no power which cannot be fairly and reasonably traced to some specific grant of power or justifiably implied and included within such express grant as proper and necessary to its exercise. Such specific grant must be either in the federal constitution or in an act of congress passed in pursuance thereof

delete this question pls it wont let me exit out