subject
Social Studies, 09.04.2020 21:49 pahalsehgal

In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the state of Georgia wanted to remove Cherokees from within its borders and began to
annex Cherokee land. How did the Court rule?
A. Only the federal government had the authority to deal with the Cherokees and the Georgia laws dealing
with them were unconstitutional.
B. The Georgia laws in the case were upheld as constitutional
The federal government and the state of Georgia both had the authority to deal with the Cherokees.
D. The state of Georgia did not have the authority to deal with the Cherokees; the true authority belonged to
the state of Alabama.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:10
Because jaedyn is a sociable, gregarious child, she tends to be noticed by her teachers and peers. how does jaedyn interact with her environment?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00
Who won the debate over ratifying the constitution
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30
The u.s. intervened in korea and vietnam to stop the spread of
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 11:00
What was piaget's explanation as to why preschool-age children in the preoperational stage make errors on tasks requiring conservation? a) preschool children's tendency toward centration prevents them from focusing on other relevant features of a situation b) preschool children have not yet developed numerical understanding; therefore, different amounts are meaningless c) preschool children's neural-visual network is not fully matured d) preschool children have not lived long enough and accrued enough experience to know the difference between quantities
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the state of Georgia wanted to remove Cherokees from within its bord...
Questions
question
English, 03.03.2020 20:00