This MARSOC element trains, advises, and assists friendly host nation forces, including naval and maritime military and paramilitary forces, to enable them to support their governments' internal security and stability, to counter subversion, and to reduce the risk of violence from internal and external threats. It has the capability to form the nucleus of a Joint Special Operations Task Force.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

This MARSOC element trains, advises, and assists friendly host nation forces, including naval and maritime military and paramilitary forces, to enable them to support their governments' internal security and stability, to counter-subversion, and to reduce the risk of violence from internal and external threats. It has the capability to form the nucleus of a Joint Special Operations Task Force. We are talking about the Marine Special Operations Regiment.

Thus Regiment is highly trained and provides military training for foreign military units. Indeed, MSOR can design the kind of training that other countries' military needs in order to be successful in their operations. It can include paramilitary and naval special operations that give the country better means to protect governments and citizens.

Marine Special Operations Regiment (MSOR)

Explanation:

The Marine Special Operations Regiment is a member of the United States Marine Corps, one of the main contributors to the Marine Corps where it works to help maintain the security and stability of the country. It is this organization that trains, advises and assists friendly host nation forces, including naval and maritime military and paramilitary forces, to enable them to support their governments' internal security and stability, combat subversion and reduce the risk of threatening violence. internal and external. external threats. In addition, it has the ability to form the core of a Joint Special Operations Task Force.

It is important to note that the main function of the Marine Special Operations Regiment is to allow military combat strategies to be offered as a way to improve the capabilities of military actions, allowing these actions to be completed efficiently and as quickly as possible.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: